I understand now that the results will look different. All of this respect is making me feel dizzy.ĭifferences in depth of field and perspective had not occurred to me fully when asking whether a photo taken with a 75mm or 80mm Rolleiflex lens will produce as satisfactory a result as one taken with a rolleinar close-up lens if it is cropped and enlarged to the same scale. My opinion with all due respect to a highly respected member.ĭennis DPurdy Rolleiclub Senior Member Posts: 236 Joined: Sat 1:14 am Location: Portland OR I think the lenses on Rolleis are sharp enough to crop some so perhaps the #1 Rolleinar is not necessary if you don't mind cropping. Though in my experience they tend to increase the likelihood of flare. I get really surprisingly good quality from them. I have all three Rolleinars for my 2.8 lenses but I hardly ever use them. Especially with the #3 Rolleinar the view of the viewing lens is very different from the view of the taking lens. Also moving in close with the Rolleinar will give you less depth of field than just cropping.Īnother thing with the Rolleinar is that the difference in the view of the two lenses becomes greater so that you don't get quite what you thought in the picture from looking through the viewing lens. Some people find that disturbing and others like it. The nose or lips will get larger and the ears might be lost. You will notice with the Rolleinar taking a close up portrait of someone you will get a distortion. Moving closer with closer focus is giving a different perspective. Cropping the image is similar to having a more telephoto lens. It is actually different to crop the image rather than move in closer.
You are a highly respected member because you can bring up a really good point like that.
0 kommentar(er)
